My latest analogy is comparing the business that I am in to a clandestine cell system. By definition, a clandestine cell - "only accounting for the leadership, can also be viewed topologically as a ring or chain network, with each leader/node heading their own particular hierarchy" [paraphrasing Wikipedia].
As I look across my profession, this is what I see - right or wrong. Let me go through a checklist as I continue to read the supporting paragraph in Wikipedia:
As I look across my profession, this is what I see - right or wrong. Let me go through a checklist as I continue to read the supporting paragraph in Wikipedia:
- "Such networks function by having their sub-networks provide information and other forms of support (the ‘many-to-one’ model), while the core group supplies ‘truth’ (of interpretation of [said religion] in this case—spiritual and political) and decisions/directions (the ‘one-to-many’ model)." Check
- "Trust and personal relationships are an essential part of the [said group] network (a limiting factor, even while it provides enhanced security)." Affirmative
- "Even while cell members are trained as ‘replaceable’ units, ‘vetting’ of members occurs during the invited training period under the observation of the core group." Dead on
Comments
Post a Comment